Implicit and Logarithmic Differentiation
Differentiate relations and variable powers without incorrectly treating dependent variables as constants.
Builds on Exponential, Logarithmic and Trigonometric Derivatives
The bigger question: How can we measure change at a single instant?
On this page
A curve need not arrive as y equals a formula
An equation can describe a curve without explicitly solving for . Along a differentiable branch , every occurrence of depends on . Applying the chain rule to therefore gives , not .
Differentiate both sides, collect all terms containing , and solve where their coefficient is nonzero. The resulting formula can fail at a point even when the curve is geometrically well behaved; the curve may have a vertical tangent or may not define one function near that point.
Visual guide
- Unit circle
- Tangent at the marked point
Worked example: a circle
For , differentiation gives . If ,
At the tangent slope is , so the line is . At this formula cannot supply a finite slope. The circle has a vertical tangent there, and solving for as a function of is more suitable locally.
For a product such as , both factors contribute: its derivative is . Skipping the product rule is a common source of an incorrect implicit derivative.
Try it yourself.
Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.
Hint 1 · Find a starting point
y depends on x during differentiation.
Hint 2 · Take the next step
Differentiate to get 2x+2y y′=0.
Show the reasoning
Answer: −x/y
Solving gives y′=−x/y; division requires y≠0.
Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.
Worked example: a variable exponent
For with , neither the ordinary power rule nor the constant-base exponential rule applies directly: both base and exponent vary. Taking logarithms gives . Differentiate:
The positive-domain restriction made the logarithms legitimate. For products and quotients of nonzero factors on an interval, using logarithms of absolute values can turn products into sums while retaining derivative identity .
Inverse functions as implicit relations
If , then . Differentiating gives , hence where the denominator is nonzero and the inverse branch is differentiable. For , with . On , because cosine is positive on the interior of that branch.
Practice
- Find for where .
- Differentiate for .
- Why does the inverse derivative formula fail for at zero?
Show worked solutions
- , so .
- gives .
- , so the reciprocal formula has a zero denominator. The inverse cube-root function has no finite derivative at zero.
Pause before the next idea.
Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.