Product and Quotient Rules
Choose a rule from the structure of an expression and simplify without losing domain restrictions.
Builds on Power Rules and Linearity
The bigger question: How can we measure change at a single instant?
On this page
Why products need two contributions
When both factors change, a product changes through either factor. Writing the increment of and adding/subtracting splits the difference quotient into two terms. Taking limits gives
Each term changes one factor while retaining the other. Multiplying derivatives would discard most of the change.
For a quotient with ,
The numerator's order matters. One way to derive the rule is to differentiate using the product rule and solve for the unknown derivative.
Visual guide
Worked example: a product with competing rates
For , take and . Then
At , the derivative is . Although is increasing for positive , the product can decrease because the sine factor changes. A derivative of a product is not determined by one factor alone.
If the function were , expanding to would be simpler. The product rule gives , which agrees with . Use algebra to choose the shortest transparent method.
Try it yourself.
Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.
Hint 1 · Find a starting point
A product changes when either factor changes.
Hint 2 · Take the next step
Differentiate one factor at a time, retaining the other.
Show the reasoning
Answer: f′g+fg′
The product rule adds f′g and fg′; multiplying derivatives omits those contributions.
Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.
Worked example: a rational function
For , the domain excludes . The quotient rule gives
As a check, polynomial division gives . Differentiating yields , the same result. Two independent forms can catch a sign mistake.
A useful special case
For , the numerator derivative vanishes, leaving . This explains the negative sign for reciprocal differentiation. If a simplification cancels a factor, retain any exclusions inherited from the original expression; an algebraically removable hole still belongs to the original problem.
A derivative can itself have zeros or undefined points, but those need separate interpretation. Solving the numerator of for zero is meaningful only at inputs in the original domain.
Practice
- Differentiate .
- Differentiate .
- Differentiate on its original domain.
Show worked solutions
- The product rule gives .
- The numerator is , giving for .
- The function equals only for , so its derivative is there. The original function still has no derivative at zero because it is not defined there.
Pause before the next idea.
Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.