Conservative Fields and Potentials

Use a potential to evaluate work and recognize when a curl test is insufficient.

Builds on Scalar and Vector Line Integrals

The bigger question: How do local changes inside a field relate to its boundary?

On this page

Endpoint information

A field is conservative on a domain if F=∇ϕ\mathbf F=\nabla\phi for a single-valued potential there. Along a smooth path, the chain rule gives dϕ(r(t))/dt=∇ϕ⋅r′d\phi(\mathbf r(t))/dt=\nabla\phi\cdot\mathbf r'. Integrating produces

∫CF⋅dr=ϕ(B)−ϕ(A).\int_C\mathbf F\cdot d\mathbf r=\phi(B)-\phi(A).

Every closed loop then has zero work. Conversely, path independence on a path-connected domain allows a potential to be defined by work from a fixed starting point.

Visual guide

VISUAL GUIDECurl can vanish away from a missing point
For F = (−y/r², x/r²), arrows circle the excluded origin. The unit loop has circulation 2π despite zero curl everywhere in the punctured plane. The hole prevents the local derivative test from proving a global potential.-2-2-1-1001122xy
  • Loop surrounding the hole
For F = (−y/r², x/r²), arrows circle the excluded origin. The unit loop has circulation 2π despite zero curl everywhere in the punctured plane. The hole prevents the local derivative test from proving a global potential.

Find a potential

For F=(P,Q)\mathbf F=(P,Q), integrate PP with respect to xx, adding an unknown function of yy. Differentiate that candidate with respect to yy and match QQ. In three dimensions repeat with the remaining component. Always check every partial derivative at the end.

Worked example: reconstructing energy

For F=(2xy,x2+2y)\mathbf F=(2xy,x^2+2y), integration gives ϕ=x2y+g(y)\phi=x^2y+g(y). Matching ϕy=x2+g′(y)\phi_y=x^2+g'(y) yields g′=2yg'=2y, so ϕ=x2y+y2+C\phi=x^2y+y^2+C. Work from (0,0)(0,0) to (1,2)(1,2) is 2+4=62+4=6, on any path within the plane.

PAUSE & THINKA quick check, not a grade

Try it yourself.

Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.

If F=∇φ along a path from A to B, what is ∫ F·dr?

Hint 1 · Find a starting point

A potential makes work depend only on endpoints.

Hint 2 · Take the next step

Use final potential minus initial potential.

Show the reasoning

Answer: φ(B)−φ(A)

The fundamental theorem for line integrals gives φ(B)−φ(A); a closed path has equal endpoints.

Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.

Worked example: a hole matters

On the punctured plane consider F=(−y/(x2+y2),x/(x2+y2))\mathbf F=(-y/(x^2+y^2),x/(x^2+y^2)). Here Qx−Py=0Q_x-P_y=0 everywhere the field is defined. But its integral around the unit circle is 2π2\pi, not zero. A globally single-valued angle potential cannot be chosen around the hole.

Conditions behind the shortcut

For a continuously differentiable field on an open simply connected planar domain, Qx=PyQ_x=P_y implies conservativeness. Curl zero is always necessary for a smooth gradient, but domain topology matters for the converse. Do not silently include excluded points inside a loop.

Practice

  1. Find a potential for (3x2,2y)(3x^2,2y).
  2. Use it to find work from (1,1)(1,1) to (2,3)(2,3).
  3. Is (−y,x)(-y,x) conservative on the plane?
Show worked solutions
  1. ϕ=x3+y2+C\phi=x^3+y^2+C; differentiating verifies both components.
  2. (8+9)−(1+1)=15(8+9)-(1+1)=15.
  3. No: Qx−Py=1−(−1)=2Q_x-P_y=1-(-1)=2. Its nonzero curl rules out a potential even before evaluating a path.

Further study

MIT OpenCourseWare: Multivariable Calculus provides a full university course with additional lectures and exercises.

MAKE IT YOURS

Pause before the next idea.

Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.

Optional marks, not a grade. Saved in this browser only. Open notebook →