Factoring, Rationalizing and Squeezing Limits

Choose a valid simplification or bound when direct substitution is inconclusive.

Builds on Infinite Limits and Asymptotes

The bigger question: What happens as we get close to a point?

On this page

Diagnose before calculating

Direct substitution is the first check when a formula is continuous at the target. If it produces 0/00/0, both numerator and denominator are tending to zero, and their relative rates matter. Factoring and rationalizing reveal a nearby equivalent expression. Squeezing controls a difficult expression between two simpler ones.

An algebraic replacement need only agree in a punctured neighborhood of the target. It may have a different value or domain exactly at the target, because a limit ignores that single point.

Visual guide

VISUAL GUIDECancellation leaves a hole
For x ≠ 1, (x² − 1)/(x − 1) equals x + 1. The open circle marks the missing value at x = 1; the nearby graph still approaches 2 from both sides.-1-100.51223.535xy
  • Quotient for x ≠ 1
For x ≠ 1, (x² − 1)/(x − 1) equals x + 1. The open circle marks the missing value at x = 1; the nearby graph still approaches 2 from both sides.

Worked example: conjugates

To find lim⁡x→0(1+x−1)/x\lim_{x\to0}(\sqrt{1+x}-1)/x, multiply by the conjugate:

1+x−1x=11+x+1,\frac{\sqrt{1+x}-1}{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x}+1}, x≠0.x\ne0.

The right-hand expression is continuous near zero and approaches 1/21/2. Multiplying only the numerator would change the expression; use the same nonzero factor above and below. The square-root domain also requires x≥−1x\ge-1.

PAUSE & THINKA quick check, not a grade

Try it yourself.

Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.

What is limₓ→₂ (x²−4)/(x−2)?

Hint 1 · Find a starting point

Factor the numerator before substituting.

Hint 2 · Take the next step

For x≠2 the quotient equals x+2.

Show the reasoning

Answer: 4

Nearby values equal x+2, whose limit is 4. The original function may be undefined at 2.

Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.

Worked example: control every approach

Since −1≤sin⁡(1/x)≤1-1\le\sin(1/x)\le1 for nonzero xx, multiplication by x2≥0x^2\ge0 gives

−x2≤x2sin⁡(1/x)≤x2.-x^2\le x^2\sin(1/x)\le x^2.

Both outside expressions approach zero, so the middle expression does too. The oscillating factor alone has no limit, but its amplitude becomes small enough to force a limit for the product.

The squeeze theorem requires the inequalities to hold throughout a sufficiently small neighborhood. Checking a few inputs, or comparing two selected paths, does not establish that condition.

A fundamental trigonometric limit

With angles in radians, lim⁡u→0sin⁡u/u=1\lim_{u\to0}\sin u/u=1. A geometric squeeze on the unit circle establishes this before derivatives are known. Thus

lim⁡x→0sin⁡(5x)2x=52lim⁡x→0sin⁡(5x)5x=52.\lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sin(5x)}{2x}=\frac52\lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sin(5x)}{5x}=\frac52.

The matching inner argument matters. Also, using 1−cos⁡x=2sin⁡2(x/2)1-\cos x=2\sin^2(x/2) gives (1−cos⁡x)/x2→1/2(1-\cos x)/x^2\to1/2. Degree-based trigonometric functions introduce a conversion factor, so the radian assumption is essential.

Choosing the next step

Polynomial differences often factor. Differences involving roots often invite a conjugate. A bounded oscillation multiplied by something tending to zero often invites squeezing. Do not use L’Hôpital's rule before establishing its hypotheses, and avoid using it to prove a trigonometric limit on which your derivative formulas already depend.

Practice

  1. Evaluate lim⁡x→4(x−2)/(x−4)\lim_{x\to4}(\sqrt{x}-2)/(x-4).
  2. Evaluate lim⁡x→0xcos⁡(1/x)\lim_{x\to0}x\cos(1/x).
  3. Evaluate lim⁡x→0sin⁡(3x)/sin⁡(2x)\lim_{x\to0}\sin(3x)/\sin(2x).
Show worked solutions
  1. Rationalization gives 1/(x+2)1/(\sqrt{x}+2), hence 1/41/4.
  2. Its absolute value is at most ∣x∣|x|, so the limit is zero. This bound handles both signs of xx.
  3. Write the ratio as [sin⁡(3x)/(3x)]/[sin⁡(2x)/(2x)]⋅3/2[\sin(3x)/(3x)]/[\sin(2x)/(2x)]\cdot3/2. Both bracketed limits are one, giving 3/23/2.
MAKE IT YOURS

Pause before the next idea.

Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.

Optional marks, not a grade. Saved in this browser only. Open notebook →