Factoring, Rationalizing and Squeezing Limits
Choose a valid simplification or bound when direct substitution is inconclusive.
Builds on Infinite Limits and Asymptotes
The bigger question: What happens as we get close to a point?
On this page
Diagnose before calculating
Direct substitution is the first check when a formula is continuous at the target. If it produces , both numerator and denominator are tending to zero, and their relative rates matter. Factoring and rationalizing reveal a nearby equivalent expression. Squeezing controls a difficult expression between two simpler ones.
An algebraic replacement need only agree in a punctured neighborhood of the target. It may have a different value or domain exactly at the target, because a limit ignores that single point.
Visual guide
- Quotient for x ≠ 1
Worked example: conjugates
To find , multiply by the conjugate:
The right-hand expression is continuous near zero and approaches . Multiplying only the numerator would change the expression; use the same nonzero factor above and below. The square-root domain also requires .
Try it yourself.
Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.
Hint 1 · Find a starting point
Factor the numerator before substituting.
Hint 2 · Take the next step
For x≠2 the quotient equals x+2.
Show the reasoning
Answer: 4
Nearby values equal x+2, whose limit is 4. The original function may be undefined at 2.
Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.
Worked example: control every approach
Since for nonzero , multiplication by gives
Both outside expressions approach zero, so the middle expression does too. The oscillating factor alone has no limit, but its amplitude becomes small enough to force a limit for the product.
The squeeze theorem requires the inequalities to hold throughout a sufficiently small neighborhood. Checking a few inputs, or comparing two selected paths, does not establish that condition.
A fundamental trigonometric limit
With angles in radians, . A geometric squeeze on the unit circle establishes this before derivatives are known. Thus
The matching inner argument matters. Also, using gives . Degree-based trigonometric functions introduce a conversion factor, so the radian assumption is essential.
Choosing the next step
Polynomial differences often factor. Differences involving roots often invite a conjugate. A bounded oscillation multiplied by something tending to zero often invites squeezing. Do not use L’Hôpital's rule before establishing its hypotheses, and avoid using it to prove a trigonometric limit on which your derivative formulas already depend.
Practice
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
- Evaluate .
Show worked solutions
- Rationalization gives , hence .
- Its absolute value is at most , so the limit is zero. This bound handles both signs of .
- Write the ratio as . Both bracketed limits are one, giving .
Pause before the next idea.
Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.