Surfaces, Level Sets and Multivariable Limits
Use domains and level curves to read a surface and distinguish a path test from an all-path proof.
Builds on Arc Length, Curvature and Turning
The bigger question: How does a surface change in different directions?
On this page
Inputs occupy a region
A scalar function assigns one output to each allowed point of a planar domain. Its graph lies in three-dimensional space. A level curve stays in the input plane and joins points with equal output. Domain restrictions remain essential: exists on the closed disk of radius three, while exists only on its interior.
A limit at requires outputs to approach along every allowed approach to that point. Two paths with different limits disprove the limit. Agreement along several selected paths never proves it by itself.
Visual guide
Paths in the input plane
- Path y = 0
- Path y = x
Values along each path
- f(t, 0) = 0
- f(t, t) = 1/2
Worked example: paths disagree
For away from the origin, the path gives zero. The path gives for nonzero . Therefore the origin has no two-variable limit, even though both coordinate axes separately give zero.
Even all straight-line tests can miss a curved-path failure. For , each line through the origin gives limit zero, but the parabola gives . The denominator is positive away from the origin, so both comparisons are legitimate.
Try it yourself.
Choose an answer and explain your reasoning to yourself. Use a hint if you get stuck.
Hint 1 · Find a starting point
A multivariable limit must work for every approach within the domain.
Hint 2 · Take the next step
A curved or diagonal path may expose different behavior.
Show the reasoning
Answer: No; other paths can behave differently.
Two successful path checks do not prove an all-path limit. One disagreeing path can disprove it.
Before moving on: what would make one of the other answers wrong? Saying why is part of understanding.
Worked example: control every path
For away from the origin,
The upper bound tends to zero with the distance to the origin, independent of direction. Squeezing proves the limit is zero. Defining makes the function continuous there.
Polar coordinates can organize such bounds, but writing a formula in is not sufficient unless the estimate is uniform in angle. A denominator containing a vanishing angular factor may prevent the proposed radial bound.
Practice
- Describe the level curves of for .
- Find the domain of .
- Prove at the origin.
Show worked solutions
- Circles centered at the origin with radius .
- The plane excluding the unit circle.
- Since , the magnitude is at most , which tends to zero along every path.
Further study
MIT OpenCourseWare: Multivariable Calculus provides a full university course with additional lectures and exercises.
Pause before the next idea.
Can you explain how the visualization connects to this lesson’s goal? If a step still feels uncertain, put this lesson on your review list and try the check again another day.